💭 Motion Statistics
Ronda 1

EC apoya la predominancia de la doctrina de la objetividad en el periodismo (Periodismo)

View Info Slide
Government 1.71
Opposition 1.29
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.64
Closing 1.36
Average Points per half
OG 2.14
OO 1.14
CG 1.29
CO 1.43
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 2

ECCQ la ASEAN debería establecer la ‘libre circulación de personas trabajadoras’ (ASEAN)

View Info Slide
Government 1.75
Opposition 1.25
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.11
Closing 1.89
Average Points per half
OG 1.29
OO 0.93
CG 2.21
CO 1.57
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 3

EC se opone a la popularización del ‘Therapy Speak’ (Therapy Speak)

View Info Slide
Government 1.50
Opposition 1.50
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.68
Closing 1.32
Average Points per half
OG 1.36
OO 2.00
CG 1.64
CO 1.00
average points per position (14 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 4

En la producción de contenido multimedia, EC prefiere el auge del enfoque ‘mujeres resilientes’ en lugar de ‘mujeres anómicas’ (Mujeres)

View Info Slide
Government 1.27
Opposition 1.73
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.85
Closing 1.15
Average Points per half
OG 1.69
OO 2.00
CG 0.85
CO 1.46
average points per position (13 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 5

ECCQ los países Latinoamericanos deberían implementar el modelo de juntas escolares en lugar del modelo educativo centralizado. (Juntas escolares)

View Info Slide
Government 1.73
Opposition 1.27
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.69
Closing 1.31
Average Points per half
OG 1.92
OO 1.46
CG 1.54
CO 1.08
average points per position (13 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Ronda 6

EC preferiría que las personas tomaran decisiones sobre sus relaciones a largo plazo priorizando la planeación estratégica (por ejemplo, visión compartida de modelos de vida a largo plazo, compatibilidad económica, etc.) en lugar de la atracción emocional y afectiva. (Decisiones)

Government 1.88
Opposition 1.12
Average Points per bench
Opening 1.58
Closing 1.42
Average Points per half
OG 2.08
OO 1.08
CG 1.69
CO 1.15
average points per position (13 debates)
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
OO results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CG results
1st 1
2nd 2
3rd 3
4th 4
CO results
Cuartos de Final

ECCQ está en los mejores del movimiento 4-B optar por moderarse (Movimiento 4-B)

View Info Slide
results from 4 debates
advanced
eliminated
OG results distribution
advanced
eliminated
OO results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CG results distribution
advanced
eliminated
CO results distribution
Semifinales

En el juzgamiento de delitos de corrupción graves, ECCQ la carga de prueba debería estar en el denunciado de demostrar su inocencia. (Demostrar inocencia)

View Info Slide
results from 2 debates
advanced
eliminated
OG results distribution
advanced
eliminated
OO results distribution
advanced
eliminated
CG results distribution
advanced
eliminated
CO results distribution
Gran Final

EC apoya una norma social dominante que nos incite a creer en la mejor versión de las personas (Mejor version)

results from 1 debate
adv.
eliminated
OG results distribution
advanced
elim.
OO results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CG results distribution
adv.
eliminated
CO results distribution